args[0]=message
args[1]=DB::DB::Message=HASH(0x1470c80)
Re[4]: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye?
16.12.2010 12:26 | s. a. veprev
Po logike, konechno, naprashivaetsya chto chastica i antichastica kak predmet i ego zerkal'noe otobrazhenie. No mozhet pri y + y = p(+) + p(-) rozhdaetsya chto-to eshe. I raznicu v massah, narushenie simmetrii, mozhno ob'yasnit' rozhdeniem dr. chasticy, kak v 20-m veke predskazali neitrino. Vozmozhno chastica i antichastica eto raznye sostoyaniya odnoi chasticy, kak v sluchae s protonom i neitronom. Massa ih razlichna, no v yadre oni rassmatrivayutsya kak odna chastica - nuklon, v raznyh sostoyaniyah. I, kstati, esli podtverditsya razlichie v massah chastic i antichastic, eto prol'et svet na asimmetriyu Bol'shogo vzryva v pol'zu materii, a ne antimaterii. Ved' esli massy i dr. odinakovy, to veroyatnost' rozhdeniya takih chastic v bol'shom vzryve odinakova (ravenstvo chastic i antichastic), a esli net, budut preobladat' processy rozhdeniya opredelennyh chastic, chto my i nablyudaem v nashei Vselennoi, v kotoroi chastic okazalos' bol'she, chem antichastic.
[Citirovat'][Otvetit'][Novoe soobshenie]
| Forumy >> Obsuzhdenie publikacii Astroneta |
| Spisok / Derevo Zagolovki / Annotacii / Tekst |
- Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (E. E. Onishenko/scientific.ru, 8.10.2003 23:45, 6.3 KBait, otvetov: 5)
- Re: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (S. I. Gordeev, 30.11.2010 9:40, 543 Bait)
- Re: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (S. I. Gordeev, 30.11.2010 9:43, 543 Bait, otvetov: 3)
- Re[2]: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (A. V. Rykov, 7.12.2010 20:09, 428 Bait, otvetov: 2)
- Re[3]: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (V. V. Komogorov, 9.12.2010 17:55, 1.1 KBait, otvetov: 1)
- >> Re[4]: Proton i antiproton: pohozhie ili odinakovye? (s. a. veprev, 16.12.2010 12:26, 931 Bait)