Peremennye Zvezdy (Variable Stars) 42, No. 4, 2022 Received 20 May; accepted 8 June. |
Article in PDF |
DOI: 10.24412/2221-0474-2022-42-17-27
|
We obtained several light curves of V957 Cep in 2009, 2011, 2013, 2016, and 2019 at the Crimean Astronomical Station of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University and at the Tien Shan Observatory of the V.G. Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute. Using the TESS satellite observations, we found brightness variations of V957 Cep with the period and amplitude . For our light curves (2009-2019) and TESS light curves (2019-2020), orbital elements were computed and a new value of the apsidal motion rate yr was derived. We found a possible light-time effect that can indicate gravitational influence of one or several additional bodies in the system on the central binary. Based on the currently available data, the amplitude and period of the light-time effect still cannot be reliably estimated. |
V957 Cep was recognized as an eclipsing variable (its orbital period being 198873) in an analysis of NSVS survey data on variable stars in the northern hemisphere (Wozniak et al., 2004), and it was included in the list of 50 new eclipsing stars with elliptical orbits found in data of ASAS, Hipparcos, and NSVS (Otero et al., 2006).
We obtained the variable's light curves in the band at the Tien Shan Astronomical Observatory of the V.G. Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute (in 2009, 2011 using the 35-cm Ritchey-Chrétien telescope with an ST-402 CCD; in 2013, 2016, 2019 using the 1-m Zeiss telescope with an Apogee 49000D9 CCD; in 2016, 2019 using the 60-cm Zeiss telescope with an Apogee Aspen CCD). Studies of the light curves, parameters of the components, orbital elements, and the determination of the apsidal motion rate were published by Kozyreva et al. (2012), Kozyreva & Kusakin (2014).
The system was also observed in two series of observations by the TESS space telescope in 2019-2020, the data were taken from the MAST archive1. The precision of TESS observations is about a few thousandths of a magnitude, it is several times better than the precision of ground-based observations. Figure 1 shows the combined light curve of the system obtained by TESS in 2019-2020.
The spectral types of the components were estimated as B7V-A3V using spectrophotometric observations made in Barnesville near Washington using an 18-inch Newton telescope (Kozyreva et al., 2012).
We analysed TESS observations using the PERDET code, based on the Fourier analysis (Breger, 1990), outside minima and obtained a frequency analysis of pulsations of the object's luminosity in the following form:
where is the differential magnitude of the object; , the number of pulsations; , time; is the amplitude of pulsations; , the frequency of pulsations; is the initial phase of pulsations, and is the normalizing constant.
Figure 2 shows the spectral amplitude, its highest peak corresponds to the frequency d and amplitude .
The reliability of the pulsations can be characterized by , where is the root-mean-square error of initial observations, is the root-mean-square error obtained after subtraction of the pulsation (Stellingwerf, 1978). The lower is this criterion, the higher is the reliability of the process. For the d pulsation, the criterion is , so the reliability is reasonably high. Table 1 shows parameters of the pulsation.
Fig. 3.
A part of the spectral amplitude of
periodic pulsations in the TESS light curve figure around the |
The spectral window and spectral amplitude are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from this plot that maxima of these functions are at different frequencies, and they are shifted by at least a half of their widths, so the pulsations found in the light curve seem to be real. Figure 4 shows the d pulsation during 10 days between JD 2458766 and 2458777.
Table 2 presents orbital elements and parameters of the system found from the light curves obtained from ground-based observations in 2009 at the Tien Shan observatory and from observations by TESS. We use the following designations: and are relative radii of the components in units of the semi-major axis of the system; is the orbital inclination; , eccentricity of the orbit; , the periastron longitude of the orbit of the primary; and are luminosities of the components in units of the binary's total luminosity; is the third light in the same units; and are limb darkening coefficients; is the standard deviation. The model and method of minimization were described by Khaliullina & Khaliullin (1984), Kozyreva & Zakharov (2001). The parameters were calculated in a free search except the limb darkening coefficients that had been fixed at values taken from van Hamme (1993) taking into account the spectral types of components and the band of observations.
The model of spherical stars (that was used in the computer program) describes detached systems adequately. The binary under investigation, with relative radii of stars 0.2 and 0.15, is close to contact. This is a potential explanation of the difference of radii of stars that can be found between the "ground-based" and "space" observations.
Tables 3 and 4 present times of minima of V957 Cep, from ground-based observations (from the literature and from our data) as well as from space observations. Minima from our ground-based light curves and from TESS space light curves were calculated using the program by Kozyreva & Zakharov (2001) jointly with the photometric elements by minimization of differences between the theoretical and observed light curves. In Table 3, (O-C) are residuals from light elements (2) (see Section 5) and (O-C), from light elements (4). In Table 4, (O-C) are residuals from light elements (3) (see Section 5) and (O-C), from light elements (5).
Due to features of the TESS duty cycle, an individual light curve within a particular minimum contains insufficient number of points, therefore the time of minimum can be calculated with a high uncertainty. Therefore, we were forced to combine two light curves in neighboring minima. The time of the minimum in Tables 3 and 4 belongs to the earliest of the two neighboring minima.
HJD-2400000 | (O-C) | (O-C) | Reference |
51504.6660 | 0.0016 | 0.0020 | Otero et al., 2006 |
54710.4925 | -0.0021 | -0.0004 | Brat et al., 2008 |
55076.4176 | -0.0032 | -0.0010 | Brat et al., 2008 |
55122.1580 | -0.0036 | 0.0007 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
55806.2827 | -0.0021 | -0.0017 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
56536.1511 | 0.0021 | -0.0003 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
57558.3524 | -0.0045 | -0.0023 | ground |
58123.1541 | -0.0027 | 0.0016 | ground |
58125.1421 | -0.0034 | 0.0009 | ground |
59141.3869 | -0.0009 | -0.0010 | ground |
58767.5053 | -0.0008 | 0.0006 | TESS |
58771.4828 | -0.0007 | 0.0005 | TESS |
58775.4601 | -0.0009 | 0.0002 | TESS |
58781.4262 | -0.0010 | -0.0001 | TESS |
58785.4039 | -0.0008 | -0.0000 | TESS |
58793.3587 | -0.0009 | -0.0002 | TESS |
58797.3359 | -0.0011 | -0.0005 | TESS |
58805.2911 | -0.0009 | -0.0002 | TESS |
58809.2685 | -0.0009 | -0.0002 | TESS |
58813.2458 | -0.0012 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58958.4238 | -0.0007 | -0.0001 | TESS |
58962.4014 | -0.0005 | -0.0001 | TESS |
58966.3789 | -0.0005 | -0.0002 | TESS |
58970.3562 | -0.0006 | -0.0004 | TESS |
58974.3339 | -0.0004 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58978.3109 | -0.0009 | -0.0009 | TESS |
58986.2665 | -0.0002 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58990.2436 | -0.0005 | -0.0005 | TESS |
58994.2211 | -0.0005 | -0.0005 | TESS |
59000.1874 | -0.0004 | -0.0003 | TESS |
59006.1536 | -0.0004 | -0.0001 | TESS |
HJD-2400000 | Reference | ||
54741.4657 | -0.0044 | -0.0012 | Brat et al., 2008 |
55089.4948 | -0.0042 | -0.0013 | Brat et al., 2008 |
55093.4725 | -0.0039 | -0.0008 | Brat et al., 2008 |
55113.3595 | -0.0043 | -0.0002 | ground |
55121.3147 | -0.0040 | 0.0003 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
55819.3656 | 0.0005 | 0.0013 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
56533.3253 | 0.0042 | 0.0018 | Kozyreva & Kusakin, 2014 |
57557.5182 | -0.0014 | 0.0008 | ground |
58649.3333 | -0.0013 | 0.0011 | ground |
58842.2403 | -0.0014 | 0.0007 | ground |
58766.6693 | -0.0005 | 0.0009 | TESS |
58770.6465 | -0.0008 | 0.0005 | TESS |
58780.5907 | -0.0003 | 0.0006 | TESS |
58784.5683 | -0.0002 | 0.0006 | TESS |
58792.5228 | -0.0006 | 0.0001 | TESS |
58796.5004 | -0.0004 | 0.0002 | TESS |
58804.4556 | -0.0002 | 0.0006 | TESS |
58808.4330 | -0.0003 | 0.0005 | TESS |
58812.4101 | -0.0006 | 0.0003 | TESS |
58957.5880 | -0.0002 | 0.0003 | TESS |
58961.5652 | -0.0005 | -0.0001 | TESS |
58965.5426 | -0.0006 | -0.0004 | TESS |
58969.5202 | -0.0005 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58973.4978 | -0.0004 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58977.4754 | -0.0002 | -0.0002 | TESS |
58985.4302 | -0.0004 | -0.0004 | TESS |
58989.4073 | -0.0007 | -0.0007 | TESS |
58993.3852 | -0.0003 | -0.0003 | TESS |
58999.3513 | -0.0004 | -0.0003 | TESS |
59005.3174 | -0.0005 | -0.0002 | TESS |
During recent nights of observations, was close to . In such a configuration (similarly to the case of ), a precise determination of the eccentricity and the primary's periastron longitude was very difficult, because widths of minima were very close to each other, the phase shift rate of the secondary minimum was strongly reduced (the orbit practically was "stopped" for the observer). In this configuration, the apsidal motion rate, calculated as the linear change of with fixed eccentricity, has a very high uncertainty, so this method was not apt for this case.
An analysis that included all times of minima permitted a more precise determination of the apsidal motion rate for V975 Cep in such orientation of its orbit with respect to the observer. Minimizing residuals between observed and calculated times of the primary and secondary minima, O-C, we found the following parameters: , , , , . Ephemerides (2) and (3) were used as calculated (C) times ( is the number of cycles from the initial epoch):
Ephemerides that include the apsidal motion of the system are the following:
The results are collected in Table 5 and shown in Fig. 5. The figure presents residuals (O-C) and theoretical curves that reflect sinusoidal variations of the times of minima due to apsidal motion. For clarity, we show the point where the primary's periastron longitude was (close to the year 1960) and the phase of the secondary minimum was 0.5.
Fig. 5. (O-C) for minima of V957 Cep, where O is the observed time and C is the calculated time (equations (2) and (3)). |
Fig. 6. (O-C) for minima of V957 Cep, where O is the observed time and C, calculated time (equations (4) and (5)). "Theory" is the light-time effect, see Table 6 ("P2"). |
Figures 6 and 7 show (O-C) for minima of V957 Cep, where O is the observed time and C, the calculated time (equations (4) and (5)). The changes of these residuals (Fig. 6) for primary and secondary minima are synchronous, so the system exhibits the light-time effect and thus we may expect the presence of one or several additional bodies. Parameters of the light-time effect are presented in Table 6. Figure 7 shows the recent part of observations, it contains two curves: "P1a+P1b" describes the sum of two periodical variations "P1a" and "P1b", "P2" describes the light-time effect as a single variation.
Attempts to compute parameters of the orbit of the third body by minimization of the light-time effect, as it was done by Kozyreva & Khaliullin (1999), show a period about and eccentricity (this solution is not shown in the figures). The duration of observations of this star from 2009 to 2021 is insufficient to reliably confirm this orbit. A lot of times of minima obtained by TESS only weakly influence the accuracy of the determination of parameters of the third body's orbit, because these minima compactly lie within a short time interval. The current set of observations makes it possible to more or less reliably estimate the period and amplitude of the light-time effect. To find these parameters, we used the PERDET code. Figure 8 shows the power spectrum of (O-C). The analysis of (O-C) residuals shows that the sum of two periods, and , satisfies the light-time effect with minimal (marks "1" and "2" in Fig. 8). The contribution of the period is most important to reduce the mean-square scatter between the theoretical and observed times, (O-C) ( , see Table 6). If the process with only one period is considered, then the best corresponds to the light-time effect with the period and amplitude .
Fig. 8. Spectral power of variations of the (O-C) residuals (O is the observed time and C, that calculated using equations (4) and (5)). "1" and "2" are variations respectively with the periods and . |
Using observations by the TESS satellite, we found pulsations of the V957 Cep brightness with the period 0664 and amplitude . We also derived new photometric elements of the system based on our light curve (2009-2019) and on the light curve by TESS (2019-2020), and re-estimated the apsidal motion rate yr.
Analyzing all times of minima, we found evidence for the presence of light-time effect in the system. It can be caused by the gravitational influence of an additional body (or even additional bodies), gravitationally bound with the binary. Our calculations show a very high eccentricity of the third body (0.8), but this result needs confirmation with future observations, because a longer set of observations is required. Currently we can only indicate most probable values for the amplitude of the light-time effect (4 minutes) and for its period (8 years). It is important to precisely find spectral types of both components of the binary and to increase the number of observed times of minima in order to derive orbital parameters of the third body (probably also using the radial velocity curve that has not been obtained yet).
This research has made use of the SIMBAD database (operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France) and of NASA's Astrophysics Data System. Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP09259383).
References:
Brát, L., Šmelcer, L., Kucáková, H., et al., 2008, Open European Journal on Variable stars, 94, 1
Breger, M., 1990, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, 2, 21
Khaliullina, A.I., Khaliullin, K.F., 1984, Soviet Astronomy, 28, 228
Kozyreva, V.S., Khaliullin, Kh.F., 1999, Astronomy Reports, 43, 679
Kozyreva, V.S., Kusakin, A.V., Menke, J., 2012, Inform. Bull. Var. Stars, No. 6020
Kozyreva, V.S., Kusakin, A.V., 2014, Astrophysics, 57, 221
Kozyreva, V.S., Zakharov, A.I., 2001, Astronomy Letters, 27, 712
Otero, S.A., Wils, R., Hoogeveen, G., Dubovsky, P.A., 2006, Inform. Bull. Var. Stars, No. 5681
Stellingwerf, R.F., 1978, Astrophys. J., 224, 953.
Sterne, T.E., 1939, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 99, 451
van Hamme, W., 1993, Astron. J., 106, 2096
Wozniak, P. R., Vestrand, W. T., Akerlof, C. W., et al., 2004, Astron. J., 127, 2436